Skip to content

Questionable compensation practice for board members

Actually, there’s no doubt: anyone who has a seat on a board of directors receives a fee as an individual («natural person»). In practice though, in many cases, this is handled differently. There are known cases where board members charge through a legal entity which leads to political discussions and restrictions in some cases.

But what does it mean on a legal and fiscal regulation level? Peter Schmid, Tax Expert at SwissLegal in St. Gallen, made it clear: «To charge board member activities through one’s own company is just wrong. The legal requirement is clearly leading to a different direction».

Please find the whole article in «Schweiz am Wochenende» here.

documents

saw_20170715_0_0_1bzgma-(1).pdf (774 KB), pdf

images

Questionable compensation practice for board members

Update

Meaningful encounters at the Career Day organized by the AEDL!

Meaningful encounters at the Career Day organized by the AEDL!

It was a pleasure to speak with law students about their future and their career aspirations.

Read more
SwissLegal committed to supporting future lawyers

SwissLegal committed to supporting future lawyers

The Swiss Moot Court 2025-2026 once again brought together law students from Swiss universities for a competition in which argumentation, legal expertise, and eloquence are put to the test in conditions close to those of a real courtroom. This year, Colette Lasserre Rouiller had the honor of sitting on the jury, drawing on her expertise to assess the quality of the participants' pleadings and arguments. Her discerning eye and professional standards enabled her to accurately evaluate the students' performances, while recognizing their commitment and rigor.

Read more
SwissLegal – at the heart of the international debate on judicial quality

SwissLegal – at the heart of the international debate on judicial quality

Dr Nicolas Rouiller, Attorney-at-law and Partner at SwissLegal Rouiller & Associés Avocats, and Dr François Paychère, Counsel to the firm, each presented their perspectives during two roundtables dedicated to quality control in the field of justice (“Control of Judicial Quality”).

Read more